UTILIZATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES IN IMMUNOLOGY: FROM LITERATURE REVIEW TO STATISTICAL PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF OBTAINED DATA
- Authors: Berdiugina O.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Immunology and Physiology UrB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia
- Section: Immunological readings in Chelyabinsk
- Submitted: 27.02.2025
- Accepted: 25.05.2025
- URL: https://rusimmun.ru/jour/article/view/17100
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.46235/1028-7221-17100-UOA
- ID: 17100
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Traditional literature review and the use of standard data analysis methods in immunology require significant time and do not always allow researchers to cope with the scale and complexity of the problem. Artificial intelligence can assist in addressing this issue by automating the processes of searching for and evaluating relevant information. The aim of this study was to determine the potential of artificial intelligence in immunological research, focusing on the automation of literature data collection and the analysis of digital information. Materials and methods. The theoretical part of the study was based on the analysis of materials from the PubMed, Scopus, ResearchGate databases covering the years 2000–2025. The practical part of the study was conducted as a comparative analysis of previously studied data and conclusions obtained using artificial intelligence technologies, exemplified by GPT v.4.0 models. Results and discussion. It was found that artificial intelligence technologies can be useful in conducting literature reviews in immunology, including summarizing findings, generating graphical representations, and visualizing new signaling pathways, cellular interactions, and disease-related factors. In addition to text analysis, artificial intelligence can be applied to statistical processing and digital data analysis, such as identifying patterns, solving forecasting problems, building models. A comparison of previously studied data with the results obtained using GPT v.4.0 revealed several limitations of different chatbot models, including the dependence of responses on query formulation style, overly generalized information synthesis, limited text output (up to 1,000 words), plagiarism risks, difficulties in generating figures, diagrams, and tables, the predominant presentation of comprehensive information in English, and the creation of non-existent references to literary sources. Conclusion. 1. Artificial intelligence can transform immunological research, allowing for a more effective literature review and deeper data analysis, but expert supervision is required at the initial stages. 2. As artificial intelligence technologies develop, they will become an integral part of the immunologist's toolkit.
Keywords
About the authors
Olga V. Berdiugina
Institute of Immunology and Physiology UrB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: berolga73@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3479-9730
SPIN-code: 5230-7435
Scopus Author ID: 6504489044
ResearcherId: O-1102-2019
Ph.D., Dr.Sci. (Biol), Lead Researcher of the Inflammation Immunology Laboratory
Russian Federation, 106 Pervomayskaya St., Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620049References
- Berdiugina O.V., Gusev E.Yu Cholecalciferol as a means of nonspecific immunoprophylaxis against COVID-19. Meditsinskaya immunologiya = Medical Immunology (Russia), 2023, Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 823-830 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-CAA-2849
- Abd-Alrazaq A., Schneider J., Mifsud B., Alam T., Househ M., Hamdi M., Shah Z. A Comprehensive Overview of the COVID-19 Literature: Machine Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 2021, Vol. 23, no. 3, p. e23703 https://doi.org/10.2196/23703
- Crispino A., Varricchio S., Ilardi G., Russo D., Di Crescenzo R.M., Staibano S., Merolla F. A Digital Workflow for Automated Assessment of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using QuPath and a StarDist-Based Model. Pathologica, 2024, Vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 390–403 https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-1069
- D'Elia D., Truu J., Lahti L., Berland M., Papoutsoglou G., Ceci M., Zomer A., Lopes M.B., Ibrahimi E., Gruca A., Nechyporenko A., Frohme M., Klammsteiner T., Pau E.C.S., Marcos-Zambrano L.J., Hron K., Pio G., Simeon A., Suharoschi R., Moreno-Indias I., Temko A., Nedyalkova M., Apostol E.-S., Truică C.-O., Shigdel R., Telalović J.H., Bongcam-Rudloff E., Przymus P., Jordamović N.B., Falquet L., Tarazona S., Sampri A., Isola G., Pérez-Serrano D., Trajkovik V., Klucar L., Loncar-Turukalo T., Havulinna A.S., Jansen C., Bertelsen R.J., Claesson M.J. Advancing microbiome research with machine learning: key findings from the ML4Microbiome COST action. Frontiers in microbiology, 2023, Vol. 14, p. 1257002 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1257002
- Elste J., Saini A., Mejia-Alvarez R., Mejía A., Millán-Pacheco C., Swanson-Mungerson M., Tiwari V. Significance of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of Virus-Host Cell Interactions. Biomolecules, 2024, Vol. 14, no. 8, p. 911 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14080911
- Gupta L., Gasparyan A.Y., Misra D.P., Agarwal V., Zimba O., Yessirkepov M. Information and Misinformation on COVID-19: a Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Korean medical science, 2020, Vol. 35, no. 27, p. e256 https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e256
- Kirouac D.C., Saez-Rodriguez J., Swantek J., Burke J.M., Lauffenburger D.A., Sorger P.K. Creating and analyzing pathway and protein interaction compendia for modelling signal transduction networks. BMC systems biology, 2012, Vol. 6, p. 29 https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-6-29
- Kryś J.D., Głowacki M., Śmieja P., Gront D. deepBBQ: A Deep Learning Approach to the Protein Backbone Reconstruction. Biomolecules, 2024, Vol. 14, no. 11, p. 1448 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111448
- Kumar A., Dixit S., Srinivasan K., M D., Vincent P.M.D.R. Personalized cancer vaccine design using AI-powered technologies. Frontiers in immunology, 2024, Vol. 15, p. 1357217 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1357217
- Liang X., Zhou R., Li Y., Yang L., Su M., Lai K.P. Clinical characterization and therapeutic targets of vitamin A in patients with hepatocholangiocarcinoma and coronavirus disease. Aging, 2021, Vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 15785–15800 https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203220
- Mohammad Piri S., Amin Habibi M., Shool S., Khazaeli Najafabadi M., Ahmadpour S., Alemi F., Aria Nejadghaderi S., Shokri P., Abdi M., Asghari N., Amir Asef-Agah S., Tavakolpour S. Role of T follicular helper cells in autoimmune rheumatic Diseases: A systematic review on immunopathogenesis and response to treatment. Human immunology, 2024, Vol. 85, no. 5, p. 110838 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110838
- Stadler M., Horrer A., Fischer M.R. Crafting medical MCQs with generative AI: A how-to guide on leveraging ChatGPT. GMS journal for medical education, 2024, Vol. 41, no. 2, p. 20 https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001675
- Wolf J., Rasmussen D.K., Sun Y.J., Vu J.T., Wang E., Espinosa C., Bigini F., Chang R.T., Montague A.A., Tang P.H., Mruthyunjaya P., Aghaeepour N., Dufour A., Bassuk A.G., Mahajan V.B. Liquid-biopsy proteomics combined with AI identifies cellular drivers of eye aging and disease in vivo. Cell, 2023, Vol. 186, no. 22, pp. 4868–4884.e12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.012
- Wong D.S.H., Santos A.F. The future of food allergy diagnosis. Frontiers in allergy, 2024, Vol. 5, p. 1456585 https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1456585
- Xiang Z., Hu J., Bu S., Ding J., Chen X., Li Z. Machine learning based prediction models for the prognosis of COVID-19 patients with DKA. Scientific reports, 2025, Vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2633 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85357-9
Supplementary files
