IMMUNOLOGY OF “SENSIBLE WORLD” AND OF THE “INTELLIGIBLE WORLD”: THE EVOLUTIONARY DECLINE AND THE “CONSTRUCTED REALITY”.



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The term “immunity” was introduced in medicine due to Ilya Mechnikov. However, the concept of infection resistance existed in European culture long before Mechnikov in the form of s.c."vital force". According to holistic methodology, the history of immunology can be divided into three unequal periods: 1) vitalistic - from antiquity to the discoveries of Mechnikov and Ehrlich 2) “Mechnikov time” (1890s -1916) 3) post-Mechnikov period (1916 – our days). At the beginning of 18th century existence of“vital force” ideas created the possibility to adapt variolation in Europe, which was based on medieval magical-mystical concepts. Without generalizing of variolation experience, Edward Jenner would hardly have been able to discover vaccination. Scientific ideas of Mechnikov were not a categorical denial of the previous period of immunology. For almost 20 years, he himself had to fend off teleological and vitalistic accusations from the side of those biologists who denied the possibility of phagocytes to act expediently. An analogy helped Mechnikov to confirm his intuition was the phenomenon of intracellular digestion of amoebas or ciliates. Secondly, he experimentally proved that phagocytosis was the product of evolution and not a “god gift”. However, in his works Mechnikov also addressed to the category of “healing forces of the body.” Modern immunology now faces a number of theoretical contradictions and methodological difficulties related to reductionists paradigm: as far as the “split” between the world of “immune objects”(immune cells receptors, antibodies, cytokines, etc) and “subjectness” of its basic categories “self-nonself”, “immune aggression, “immune defence”, etc., Ilya Mechnikov tried to overcome this contradiction  substantiating the phenomenon of phagocytosisas as functional system acting in accordance with defense purpose. The construction of “holistic”subjects-objects”models of immunity (such as symbiosis model of plant immunity) could be the way of the overcoming of above mentioned contradictions

About the authors

Mark Vasilievich Goloviznin

Federal State budget educational institution of high education “Russian University of Medicine”

Email: mvasilef@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0004-4615
Scopus Author ID: 6505772371

candidate of medical sciences, docent, department of internal diseases of dental faculty

Russian Federation, 127006, Russian Federation, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya str., 4

Vyacheslav Ivanovich Moiseev

Federal State budget educational institution of high education “Russian University of Medicine”

Email: vimo@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7352-0064
SPIN-code: 9609-6783

doctor of philosophic sciences, professor, head of department of philosophy, bioetics and humanities

Russian Federation, 127006, Russian Federation, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya str, 4

Vitaly Timofeevich Timofeev

Federall State autonomous educational institution of high education Russian Scientific-Research Medical University named after N.I Pirogov Ministry of Health of Russain federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: vtt3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3805-5942
SPIN-code: 2323-5061

doctor of medical sciences, Chief Researcher of the department of faculty therapy named after academician A.I. Nesterov, of medical faculty. 

Russian Federation, 117513, Russain Federation, Moscow, Ostrovityanova str, 1.

Natalia Sergeevna Lakhonina

Federal State budget educational institution of high education “Russian University of Medicine”

Email: natalia.lakhonina@gmail.com

assistant of the department of internal diseases of dental faculty

Russian Federation, 127006, Russian Federation, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya str.,4

Yulia Rafaelevna Buldakova

Federal State budget educational institution of high education “Russian University of Medicine”

Email: juliafamily@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6581-3323

candidate of medical sciences, docent of the department of internal diseases of dental faculty

Russian Federation, 127006, Russian Federation, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya str.,4

References

  1. Goloviznin M.V., Moiseev V.I.,Timofeev V.T., Lakhonina N.S., Buldakova Yu.R. The problem of “constructed reality” in immunology.History and Modernity// The Eight’s Russia Philosophy Congress. Philosophy in the polycentric world. Round tables. Collocted works. M. 2021 1250 p.
  2. Goloviznin M.V., Timofeev V.T. Simbyosis as prospective axiological model of immune system activity (using the example of plant immunity) philosophical problems of biology and medicine. Vol.16, M.2022, 214 p.
  3. Mechnikov Ilya Ilyich On the healing powers of the body //Mechnikov I.I. Collected works, Moscow, Medgiz 1950., vol 6. 368 p.
  4. Mechnikov Ilya Ilyich On the healing powers of the body //Mechnikov I.I. Collected works, Moscow, Medgiz 1952., vol 7. 564 p.
  5. Petrov R.V. “Me or not me” (immune mobilities) Moscow., 1983, 273 p.
  6. Martin, E. Flexible Bodies: Tracking Immunity in American Culture. From the Days of Polio to the Age of AIDS. Beacon Press; 1994, 319 с.
  7. Turney J. Beyond cell wars; 2016. Электронный ресурс; URL:
  8. https://aeon.co/essays/why-we-should-guard-against-military-notions-of-immunity (дата обращения: 15 марта 2024 г).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Goloviznin M.V., Moiseev V.I., Timofeev V.T., Lakhonina N.S., Buldakova Y.R.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 11525 от 04.01.2002.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies