CYTOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CELLULAR COMPARTMENT OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN PATIENTS AFTER END-TO-END KERATOPLASTY



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract

The graft rejection reaction, especially in patients from the "high risk" group, is a complex immunological process that remains an urgent problem in ophthalmology. The cornea, despite its immunological privilege, loses its protective barriers under certain conditions (vascularization, inflammation), which leads to the development of an immune response against the transplant. The key mechanisms of rejection are activation of T-lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+), as well as an imbalance between effector and regulatory immune cells. Modern methods of immunological monitoring, including analysis of T-cell populations, make it possible to detect signs of rejection in a timely manner and adjust therapy to improve long-term transplant results. The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative cytometric analysis of the population and subpopulation composition of blood lymphocytes in patients after end-to-end keratoplasty.

Materials and methods. The study involved 46 patients who underwent end-to-end keratoplasty, who were divided into two subgroups: those with transplant rejection (n=25) and those with successful engraftment (n=21), as well as a control group of 21 healthy volunteers. The immunological analysis included venous blood sampling and quantitative determination of lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry using a Navios cytofluorimeter (Beckman Coulter, USA) and CD45+ and CD46+ markers. Key populations of lymphocytes, including T helper cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, NK cells, B lymphocytes, and activated T cells, were studied to identify differences in the immune status of patients. Results. Comparative cytometric analysis of the population and subpopulation composition of peripheral blood lymphocytes in "high-risk" patients with graft rejection showed a number of significant changes in the form of an increase in the total number of T-lymphocytes, T-helper cells, T-cytotoxic, T-lymphocytes with markers of early and late activation, which indicates the key role of T-cell the role of immunity in the mechanisms of development of late cellular rejection reactions.  Conclusion. 1. The data obtained demonstrate the involvement of systemic cellular mechanisms in the implementation of the rejection reaction of the native corneal allograft and dictate the need for a more detailed study of the T-cell response of the immune system. 2. Cytometric assessment of subpopulations of immunocytes makes it possible to identify early signs of immune activation associated with rejection and opens up new opportunities for the development of personalized and effective treatment strategies aimed at improving transplant outcomes.

About the authors

Andrey Aleksandrovich Kuznetzov

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Email: cheloptic@mail.ru

Ph.D. of Medical Sciences,  Head of the Ophthalmology Center

Russian Federation, Vorovskiy str., 70, Chelyabinsk, 454048, Russia

Aleksey Mikhaylovich Bystrov

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk, Russia;
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "South-Ural State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Email: highvision@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-0712-4491
SPIN-code: 1359-5140

Researcher of Ophthalmology Department ;

Senior Laboratory Assistant at the Department of Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Russian Federation, Vorovskiy str., 70, Chelyabinsk, 454048, Russia; Vorovskiy str., 64, Chelyabinsk, 454141, Russia

Evgeniya Valerevna Davydova

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk, Russia;
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "South-Ural State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Email: davidova-ev.med@yandex.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Early Medical Rehabilitation of the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Professor of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine 

Russian Federation, Vorovskiy str., 70, Chelyabinsk, 454048, Russia; Vorovskiy str., 64, Chelyabinsk, 454141, Russia

Margarita Vladimirovna Chereshneva

Institute of Immunology and Physiology UrB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Email: mchereshneva@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Chief Researcher at the Laboratory of Immunophysiology and Immunopharmacology

Russian Federation, Pervomayskaya St., 106, Yekaterinburg, 620078, Russia

Tatyana Valerevna Gavrilova

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Perm State Medical University named after Academician E.A. Wagner" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Perm, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: gavrilova.tv@mail.ru

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology

Russian Federation, Petropavlovsk Street,26, Perm, 614990, Perm Region

References

  1. Аветисов С.Э., Егоров Е.А., Мошетова Л.К. Национальное руководство по офтальмологии. В кн.: Мороз З.И. Кератопластика и кератопротезирование. – М.: Гэотар-Медиа, 2008. – С. 472-474. Avetisov S.E., Egorov E.A., Moshetova L.K. National Guidelines for Ophthalmology. In: Moroz Z.I. Keratoplasty and keratoprosthetics. Moscow: Geotar-Media, 2008, pp. 472-474 ISBN 978-5-9704-5125-0
  2. URL: https://www.rosmedlib.ru/book/ISBN9785970451250.html
  3. Зурочка А.В., Хайдуков С.В., Кудрявцев И.В., Черешнев В.А. Проточная цитометрия в биомедицинских исследованиях. - Екатеринбург: РИО УрО РАН, 2018. - 720 с. Zurochka A.V., Khaidukov S.V., Kudryavtsev I.V., Chereshnev V.A. Flow cytometry in biomedical research. Ekaterinburg: RIO, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018. 720 p. ISBN 978-5-7691-2497-6.
  4. Alio J.L., Montesel A., El Sayyad F., Barraquer R.I., Arnalich-Montiel F., Del Barrio J.L.A. Corneal graft failure: an update. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, Vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 1049-1058. ISSN : 1468-2079 [doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316705]
  5. Avunduk A.M., Avunduk M.C., Tekelioğlu Y., Kapıcıoğlu Z. CD4+ T cell/CD8+ T cell ratio in the anterior chamber of the eye after penetrating injury and its comparison with normal aqueous samples. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998, Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 204-207 ISSN: 0021-5155 [doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(97)00142-1]
  6. Boisgéraul F., Liu Y., Anosova N., Ehrlich E., Dana M.R., Benichou G. Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in allorecognition: lessons from corneal transplantation. The Journal of Immunology, 2001, Vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 1891-1899. ISSN 0022-1767 [doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.4.1891]
  7. Chi H., Wei C., Ma L., Yu Y., Zhang T., Shi W. The ocular immunological alterations in the process of high-risk corneal transplantation rejection. Experimental Eye Research, 2024, Vol. 245, pp. 109971 ISSN : 1096-0007 [doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.109971]
  8. Maharana P.K., Mandal S., Kaweri L., Sahay P., Lata S., Asif M.I., Sharma N. Immunopathogenesis of corneal graft rejection. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, Vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1733-1738. ISSN 0301-4738 [doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2866_22]
  9. Mandal S., Maharana P.K., Kaweri L., Asif M.I., Nagpal R., Sharma N. Management and prevention of corneal graft rejection. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, Vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 3149-3159. ISSN 0301-4738 [doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_228_23]
  10. Owen D.L., Mahmud S.A., Vang K.B., Kelly R.M., Blazar B.R., Smith K.A., Farrar M.A. Identification of cellular sources of IL-2 needed for regulatory T cell development and homeostasis. The Journal of Immunology, 2018, Vol. 200, no. 12, pp. 3926-3933 ISSN 0022-1767 [doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800097]
  11. Sakowska J., Glasner P., Dukat-Mazurek A., Rydz A., Zieliński M., Pellowska I., Trzonkowski P. Local T cell infiltrates are predominantly associated with corneal allograft rejection. Transplant Immunology, 2023, Vol. 79, pp. 101852 ISSN : 1878-5492 [doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101852]
  12. Scarabosio A., Surico P.L., Tereshenko V., Singh R.B., Salati C., Spadea L., Zeppieri M. Whole-eye transplantation: Current challenges and future perspectives. World Journal of Transplantation, 2024, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 95009 ISSN : 2220-3230 [doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.95009]
  13. Vabres B., Pleyer U., Hjortdal J., Murphy C.C., Armitage W.J., Imrie L., Degauque N. Corneal Graft Rejection: Is it Reflected in Peripheral Immune Cells? Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study (VISICORT). Transplantation, 2025, pp. 10-1097 ISSN: 1534-6080 [doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005280]
  14. Völker-Dieben H.J., Claas F.H., Schreuder G.M.T., Schipper R.F., Pels E., Persijn G.G., D’Amaro J. Beneficial effect of HLA-DR matching on the survival of corneal Allografts. Transplantation, 2000, Vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 640-648 ISSN: 1534-6080 [doi: 10.1097/00007890-200008270-00018]
  15. Yin J. Advances in corneal graft rejection. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2021, Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 331-337 ISSN: 1531-7021 [doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000767]
  16. Zhu J., Inomata T., Di Zazzo A., Kitazawa K., Okumura Y., Coassin M., Murakami A. Role of immune cell diversity and heterogeneity in corneal graft survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021, Vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 4667 ISSN: 2077-0383 [doi: 10.3390/jcm10204667]

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Kuznetzov A.A., Bystrov A.M., Davydova E.V., Chereshneva M.V., Gavrilova T.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 11525 от 04.01.2002.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies