Generation of human myeloid suppressor cells in the in vitro experimental model

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Myeloid suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells that generally differentiate into macrophages, granulocytes, and dendritic cells. However, in pathology, these cells acquire a suppressor phenotype, blocking immune response. In particular, MDSC levels increase in many pathological conditions, including inflammation, sepsis, traumatic shock, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and pregnancy. Over the past 12 years, an interest in examining this cell population has been steadily increased [PUBMED: 2008 (65 articles); 2020 (> 650 entries)] that will expand our understanding of immune system functioning. In humans, MDSCs are characterized by HLA-DR-CD33+CD11b+ phenotype, in turn being subdivided into CD15+ or CD66+ granulocytic (G-MDSC), CD14+ monocytic (M-MDSC), and early (e-MDSC) MDSC bearing HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+CD14-CD66b- phenotype. This work was aimed to develop an adequate experimental model allowing to evaluate cytokine-driven differentiation of human MDSCs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in long-term in vitro culture system. For this, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy donors induced to express MDSC phenotype with GM-CSF and IL-6 (40 or 20 ng/ml) cultured for 7, 14, 21 days. In several experiments, LPS (100 ng/ml) was added to the cultured cells 24 hours before immunophenotyping. The percentage of living Zombie Aquanegative cells in cultures (gated on cells according to FSC/SSC) ranged from 90.5-93.9%. No significant differences were observed between cultured cells. In our experimental conditions, the mean percentage of total MDSC subpopulation reached 2-2.3% of total living cells, exceeding that one by 9-10-fold found in freshly isolated mononuclear cells from healthy subjects. Based on the results of our experimental study, we found that induction of e-MDSC derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells requires two weeks of co-culture with 40 ng/ml IL-6 and 40 ng/ml GM-CSF. “Mature” MDSCs (M-MDSC + G-MDSC) yield was peaked in the following conditions: co-culture for 3 weeks with 20 ng/ml IL-6 and 20 ng/ml GM-CSF added with 100 ng/ml LPS 24 hours before completing protocol. Overall, further examining factors modulating MDSC differentiation will reveal conditions necessary for generating this suppressor cell subset potentially used in clinical practice.

About the authors

V. P. Timganova

Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: timganovavp@gmail.com

Timganova Valeriya P. - PhD (Biology), Research Associate, Laboratory of Ecological Immunology

614081, Perm, Golev str., 13

Phone: 7 (902) 836-14-55

Russian Federation

M. S. Bochkova

Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru

PhD (Biology), Research Associate, Laboratory of Ecological Immunology

Perm

Russian Federation

S. V. Uzhviyuk

Perm State National Research University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Student, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Biology

Perm

Russian Federation

K. Yu. Shardina

Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Graduate Student, Laboratory of Ecological Immunology

Perm

Russian Federation

S. A. Zamorina

Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Perm State National Research University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

PhD, MD (Biology), Leading Research Associate, Laboratory of Ecological Immunology; Professor, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Biology

Perm

Russian Federation

M. B. Rayev

Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Perm State National Research University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

PhD, MD (Biology), Leading Research Associate, Laboratory of Ecological Immunology; Professor, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Biology

Perm

Russian Federation

References

  1. Атретханы К.-С.Н., Друцкая М.С. Миелоидные супрессорные клетки и провоспалительные цитокины как мишени терапии рака // Биохимия, 2016. Т. 81, № 11. С. 1520-1529. [Atretkhany K.-S.N., Drutskaya M.S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and proinflammatory cytokines as targets for cancer therapy Biokhimiya = Biochemistry, 2016, Vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1520-1529. (In Russ.)]
  2. Пономарев А.В. Миелоидные супрессорные клетки: общая характеристика // Иммунология, 2016. Т. 37, № 1. С. 47-50. [Ponomarev A.V. Myeloid suppressor cells: general characteristics. Immunologiya = Immunology, 2016, Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 47-50. (In Russ.)]
  3. Dumitru C.A., Moses K., Trellakis S., Lang S., Brandau S. Neutrophils and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells: immunophenotyping, cell biology and clinical relevance in human oncology. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 2012, Vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1155-1167.
  4. Gabrilovich D.I., Nagaraj S. Myeloid- derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2009, Vol. 9, pp. 162-174.
  5. Gabrilovich D.I., Ostrand-Rosenberg S., Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2012, Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 253-268.
  6. Goedegebuure P., Mitchem J.B., Porembka M.R., Tan M.C.B., Belt B.A., Wang-Gillam A., et al. Myeloidderived suppressor cells: general characteristics and relevance to clinical management of pancreatic cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2011, Vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 734-751.
  7. Greten T.F., Manns M.P., Korangy F. Myeloid derived suppressor cells in human diseases. Int. Immunopharmacol., 2011, Vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 802-807.
  8. Kotsakis A., Harasymczuk M., Schilling B., Georgoulias V., Argiris A., Whiteside T.L. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell measurements in fresh and cryopreserved blood samples. J. Immunol. Methods, 2012, Vol. 381, pp. 14-22.
  9. Kumar V., Patel S., Tcyganov E., Gabrilovich D.I. The nature of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol., 2016, Vol. 37, pp. 208-220.
  10. Lechner M.G., Liebertz D.J., Epstein A.L. Characterization of cytokineinduced myeloid derived suppressor cells from normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Immunol., 2010, Vol. 185, no. 4, pp. 2273-2284.
  11. Pak V.N. Selective targeting of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients through AFP-binding receptors. Future Sci. OA, 2018, Vol. 5, no. 1. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0029.
  12. Tesi R.J. MDSC; The most important cell you have never heard of. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 2019, Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 4-7.
  13. Veglia F., Perego M., Gabrilovich D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells coming of age. Nat. Immunol., 2018, Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 108-119.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Timganova V.P., Bochkova M.S., Uzhviyuk S.V., Shardina K.Y., Zamorina S.A., Rayev M.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 11525 от 04.01.2002.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies