Influence of clinical features in acute COVID-19 infection on the course of post-COVID syndrome

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in global morbidity and high mortality worldwide. According to case histories, for a long time (from six months to 2-3 years) after acute COVID-19 infection, patients experience severe fatigue, increased fatigue, an increase in the incidence of acute respiratory viral infections per year, an increase in the recurrence of skin diseases, allergies, exacerbation of pulmonary pathology, urinary tract diseases, an increase in the recurrence of chronic infectious diseases such as herpesvirus and papillomavirus infections, and an aggravation of chronic cardiovascular and other somatic diseases of various organs and systems. Patients were examined at least six months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Such persistent post-infectious consequences are known as post-COVID syndrome. When assessing post-COVID syndrome, it is necessary to identify the main clinical syndromes of multiorgan pathology characteristic of post-COVID patients. Endocrine and cardiac manifestations of post-COVID syndrome can be a consequence of direct damage by the virus, immunological and inflammatory damage, as well as iatrogenic complications. Objective of the study: to assess the impact of the severity of acute COVID-19 on the course of post-COVID syndrome. Research objectives: 1. To analyze the severity of clinical manifestations of the symptom complex of cardiovascular damage in post-COVID patients depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19. 2. To analyze the severity of clinical manifestations of endocrine system pathology, including newly diagnosed, in post-COVID patients depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19. Since no statistically significant differences by gender and age were found, all patients were divided into groups by the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19 according to clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of a new coronavirus infection. This study showed that the clinical picture of post-COVID syndrome is characterized by a pronounced diversity of the formation of multiple organ pathology, both newly diagnosed and manifested in an increase in the frequency of exacerbations of chronic diseases. Conclusions: 1. According to the data obtained, reliable differences were obtained between groups CT0 and CT1-2, as well as CT0 and CT3-4: the frequency of exacerbations of cardiovascular diseases in the post-COVID period is significantly higher in groups with lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19 compared to the group of patients without lung damage. These data indicate that cardiovascular disorders are directly related to the severity of COVID-19, viral load, and were detected most frequently (68%) in post-COVID patients who had a severe coronavirus infection. 2. According to the data obtained, the frequency of glucose metabolism disorders, including those detected for the first time, significantly increased in the post-COVID period in patients with lung damage in the acute period of infection, while no significant differences were found in thyroid diseases, with the exception of AIT. Perhaps these disorders are also associated, on the one hand, with the use of corticosteroid therapy in the acute period of coronavirus infection, and on the other hand, with disruption of the regulatory mechanisms of the endocrine and immune systems under the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which once again confirms our assumptions about the formation of multiple organ pathology in post-COVID patients.

Full Text

The work is completed on the topic of State assignments FBIS Federal Scientific Research Institute of Viral Infections “VIROM” Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Consumption “Study of the mechanisms of chronic viral infection formation in patients with post-COVID syndrome and impaired immune system functions. Development of pathogenetic approaches to effective prevention and immunocorrection of identified disorders in patients with “post-COVID syndrome”. State Registration No. 124031800093-5.

Introduction

The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to mass morbidity and high mortality on the planet. According to a survey of those who have recovered from acute COVID-19, for a long time (from six months to 2-3 years), patients experience significant asthenia, decreased performance, an increase in the incidence of acute respiratory viral infections per year, an increase in the frequency and severity of relapses of diseases of various organs and systems: skin, allergic, cardiovascular, endocrine, chronic injection and others. The examination of patients was carried out at least six months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Such persistent post-infectious consequences are known as post-COVID syndrome [11]. When assessing post-COVID syndrome, it is necessary to reveal the main clinical manifestations of multiorgan pathology characteristic of post-COVID patients according to the literature [6]. For example, out of 410 participants in a Swiss study, 7-9 months after diagnosis with COVID-19, 39.0% of patients reported long-term fatigue (20.7%), loss of taste or smell (16.8%), shortness of breath (11.7%), and headache (10.0%), including among young, previously healthy individuals [10]. In China, 1,733 patients were examined 6 months after acute COVID-19; prolonged tachycardia was recorded in 9% and chest pain in 5% of patients [3]. During autopsy of 39 people who died from COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected in the heart in 62.5% of cases [6, 7]. The inflammatory response it induced often leads to the death of cardiomyocytes and fibro-fatty replacement of desmosomal proteins important for intercellular adhesion [17]. In patients recovered from COVID-19, the cardiac metabolic demand may be persistently increased, which has been observed in the long term [20]. This may be due to decreased cardiac reserve, corticosteroid use, and dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Fibrosis, myocardial scarring, and cardiomyopathy that occur after a viral infection often lead to cardiac arrhythmia via the re-entry mechanism [1, 6, 18]. COVID-19 can also exacerbate cardiac arrhythmia due to increased catecholamine influence as a result of the cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-1, and TNFα, which can prolong the ventricular action potential by modulating the expression of cardiomyocyte ion channels [8]. Autonomic dysfunction with adrenergic influences predominating after viral diseases, including COVID-19, leads to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and non-physiological sinus tachycardia [12]. Diabetic ketoacidosis was observed in patients who did not previously have diabetes mellitus, weeks or months after the disappearance of COVID-19 symptoms [18]. Unfortunately, there is still insufficient information on how long after COVID-19 the severity of pre-existing diabetes mellitus worsens or a hereditary predisposition to diabetic ketoacidosis manifests itself, and this issue is addressed to the international CoviDiab registry [15]. Ruggeri R.M. et al. (2021) write about subacute thyroiditis with clinical manifestations of thyrotoxicosis weeks after the disappearance of respiratory symptoms [16]. Endocrine manifestations of post-COVID syndrome may be due to direct damage by the virus, immunological and inflammatory damage, and iatrogenic complications. Expression of ACE2 and transmembrane serine protease in pancreatic β-cells has been reported, but researchers believed that the primary insulin deficiency in COVID-19 is likely mediated by inflammation or response to infectious stress along with peripheral insulin resistance [2]. Autopsy studies of COVID-19 patients confirmed the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication in human pancreatic β cells, leading to their death or transdifferentiation, decreased insulin production and release [9, 19]. Thus, according to the conducted theoretical research, there are indications in the literature of various clinical pathological manifestations of post-COVID syndrome, however, there is no systematization of these studies, there is insufficient data on the pathogenesis of the formation of clinical manifestations of post-COVID syndrome, there is no data on the relationship between the course of post-COVID syndrome and the severity of acute coronavirus infection in the anamnesis. All this served as the basis for this study.

Objective of the study: to assess the impact of the severity of acute COVID-19 on the course of post-COVID syndrome.

Research objectives:

  1. To analyze the severity of clinical manifestations of the symptom complex of cardiovascular damage in post-COVID patients depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19.
  2. To analyze the severity of clinical manifestations of endocrine system pathology, including newly diagnosed, in post-COVID patients depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19. Since no statistically significant differences by gender and age were found, all patients were divided into groups by the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19 according to clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of a new coronavirus infection:

Materials and methods

A total of 131 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection were examined. Of these, 48 were men aged 20 to 76 years (mean age 55.3 years) and 83 were women aged 21 to 79 years (mean age 53.4 years). The inclusion criteria in the study groups were: confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the presence of IgA, IgM to the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the acute and post-acute periods of infection and IgG to the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the recovery period, computed tomography data of the lungs on the presence or absence of changes of the “ground glass” type. This study was conducted at least 6-12 months after the infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. All patients were preliminarily examined by a general practitioner and an immunologist-allergist in order to identify concomitant diseases, as well as by doctors of other specialties before COVID-19 to establish concomitant diagnoses. The groups were randomized by gender, age, concomitant diseases according to the χ2 criterion. All studies were approved by the Independent Local Ethics Committee at the State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Republic of Chelyabinsk “City Clinical Hospital No. 1” of Chelyabinsk (protocol No. 8 dated 04/11/2022), on the basis of which these studies were conducted, and by the Independent Local Ethics Committee at the Federal Research Institute of Virology and Infection “Virom” of Rospotrebnadzor of Yekaterinburg, protocol No. 1 dated 03/22/2024, on the basis of which these studies were conducted.

Clinical research methods:

  • Identification of persons with post-COVID syndrome after examination by doctors: therapist, allergist-immunologist.
  • Filling out the immunological examination card.
  • Physical, laboratory and instrumental examinations for diagnosis.

Statistical research methods

Based on the study results, a database was created in Excel (MS Office 2007). Data processing and analysis were performed using R 3.1.1 12 (RFoundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Microsoft Excel version 14.0. Student’s t-tests were used for parametric data; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Equipment

The following equipment was used: computers with software packages required for mathematical and statistical analysis of the results.

Results and discussion

No statistically significant differences by gender and age were found, all patients were divided into groups by the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19, which is the determining criterion for assessing the severity of acute COVID-19 according to clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of a new coronavirus infection [13, 14]:

Group 1 – CT0 (without lung damage of the “ground glass” type according to CT data)

Group 2 – CT1-2 (less than 50% lung damage of the “ground glass” type according to CT data)

Group 3 – CT3-4 (more than 50% lung damage of the “ground glass” type according to CT data)

According to the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who had complaints of aggravation of symptoms of comorbid pathology already existing before the pandemic (increased relapses, worsening of the severity of the course), or of newly diagnosed somatic diseases was determined after COVID-19. This study presents data on cardiovascular and endocrine pathology.

According to these data, presented in Table 1, reliable differences were obtained between groups CT0 and CT1-2, as well as CT0 and CT3-4: the frequency of exacerbations of cardiovascular diseases in the post-COVID period is significantly higher in groups with lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19 compared to the group of patients without lung damage. These data indicate that cardiovascular damage is directly related to the severity of COVID-19, viral load and was detected most often (68%) in post-COVID patients who had a severe coronavirus infection.

 

Table 1. Severity of clinical manifestations of a symptom complex of damage to the cardiovascular system in kidney-shaped patients, depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19

Diseases with increased recurrence or first identified after clinical recovery from acute COVID-19 infection / degree of lung damage according to CT

Total number of examined patients

(n = 131)

Group 1

CT0 (n = 38)

Group 2

CT1-2 (n = 68)

Group 3

CT3-4 (n = 25)

abs

%

abs

%

abs

%

abs

%

Diseases of the cardiovascular system (hypertension, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular accident)

49

37.4

5

13.2

27

39.7 p1-2 < 0.05

17

68.0

p1-3 < 0.05

p2-3 < 0.05

Note. The significance of differences between groups p1-p2, p1-p3, p2-p3. Differences of p < 0.05 (Student’s criterion) were considered significant.

 

According to the data presented in Table 2, the frequency of glucose metabolism disorders, including those newly identified, increased significantly in the post-COVID period in patients with lung damage during the acute period of infection, while no significant differences were found in thyroid diseases, with the exception of autoimmune thyroiditis.

 

Table 2. Severity of clinical manifestations of endocrine system pathology, including those newly identified, in postmenopausal patients, depending on the degree of lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19

Diseases with increased recurrence or first identified after clinical recovery from acute COVID-19 infection / degree of lung damage according to CT

Total number of examined patients

(n = 131)

Group 1

CT0 (n = 38)

Group 2

CT1-2 (n = 68)

Group 3

CT3-4 (n = 25)

abs

%

abs

%

abs

%

abs

%

Glucose metabolism disorder

47

35.9

2

5.3

30

44.1

p1-2 < 0.05

15

60.0

p1-3 < 0.05

Diseases of the thyroid gland, with the exception of autoimmune thyroiditis

35

26.7

7

18.4

19

27.9

9

36.0

Note. As for Table 1.

 

Perhaps these disorders are also associated, on the one hand, with the use of corticosteroid therapy during the acute period of coronavirus infection, and on the other hand, with disruption of the regulatory mechanisms of the endocrine and immune systems under the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which once again confirms our assumptions about the formation of multiple organ pathology in post-COVID patients.

According to ICD-10 and ICD-11 [4, 5], the above-mentioned somatic diseases have, among other things, pathogenetically significant mechanisms of immune system disorders, as does COVID-19, the severe forms of which are also based on damage to the immune system. In this regard, the immune status of patients included in this clinical study was assessed.

Thus, the clinical picture of post-COVID syndrome is characterized by a pronounced diversity of the formation of multiple organ pathology, both newly identified and manifested in the exacerbation of chronic diseases.

Conclusions

  1. According to the data obtained, reliable differences were obtained between groups CT0 and CT1-2, as well as CT0 and CT3-4: the frequency of exacerbations of cardiovascular diseases in the post-COVID period is significantly higher in groups with lung damage in the acute period of COVID-19 compared to the group of patients without lung damage. These data indicate that cardiovascular disorders are directly related to the severity of COVID-19, viral load, and were detected most frequently (68%) in post-COVID patients who had a severe coronavirus infection.
  2. According to the data obtained, the frequency of glucose metabolism disorders, including those detected for the first time, significantly increased in the post-COVID period in patients with lung damage in the acute period of infection, while no significant differences were found in thyroid diseases, with the exception of AIT. Perhaps these disorders are also associated, on the one hand, with the use of corticosteroid therapy in the acute period of coronavirus infection, and on the other hand, with disruption of the regulatory mechanisms of the endocrine and immune systems under the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which once again confirms our assumptions about the formation of multiple organ pathology in post-COVID patients.
×

About the authors

Maria A. Dobrynina

Federal Research Institute of Viral Infections “Virom”

Author for correspondence.
Email: mzurochka@mail.ru

PhD (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Transmissible Viral Diseases

Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg

Vladimir A. Zurochka

Federal Research Institute of Viral Infections “Virom”

Email: v_zurochka@mail.ru

PhD, MD (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Immunobiotechnology

Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg

A. V. Zurochka

Federal Research Institute of Viral Infections “Virom”

Email: av_zurochka@mail.ru

PhD, MD (Medicine), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Transmissive Viral Infections

Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg

References

  1. Costa L.B., Perez L.G., Palmeira V.A., Macedo E. Cordeiro T., Ribeiro V.T., Lanza K., Simões E. Silva A.C. Insights on SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Interactions With the Renin-Angiotensin System. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2020, Vol. 8, 559841. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.559841.
  2. Gentile S., Strollo F., Mambro A., Ceriello A. COVID-19, ketoacidosis and new-onset diabetes:are there possible cause and effect relationshipsamong them? Diabetes Obes. Metab., 2020, Vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2507-2508.
  3. Huang C., Huang L., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Gu X., Kang L., Guo L., Liu M., Zhou X., Luo J., Huang Z., Tu S., Zhao Y., Chen L., Xu D., Li Y., Li C., Peng L., Li Y., Xie W., Cui D., Shang L., Fan G., Xu J., Wang G., Wang Y., Zhong J., Wang C., Wang J., Zhang D., Cao B. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet, 2021, Vol. 397, no. 10270, pp. 220-232.
  4. International Classification of Diseases 11 revision: ICD-11: Global Standard for Diagnostic Information on Health: online version. World Health Organization. 2022. Available at: https://icd.who.int/ru.
  5. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, (ICD-10): online version. Adopted by the 43rd World Health Assembly. 2019. Available at: https://mkb-10.com.
  6. Kanorsky S.G. Postcovoid syndrome: prevalence and pathogenesis of organ lesions, directions of correction. A systematic review. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin, 2021, Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 90-116. (In Russ.)
  7. Lindner D., Fitzek A., Bräuninger H., Aleshcheva G., Edler C., Meissner K., Scherschel K., Kirchhof P., Escher F., Schultheiss H.P., Blankenberg S., Püschel K., Westermann D. Association of Cardiac Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in Confirmed COVID-19 Autopsy Cases. JAMA Cardiol., 2020, Vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1281-1285.
  8. Liu P.P., Blet A. Smyth D., Li H. The Science Underlying COVID-19: Implications for the Cardiovascular System. Circulation, 2020, Vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 68-78.
  9. Müller J.A., Groß R., Conzelmann C., Krüger J., Merle U., Steinhart J., Weil T., Koepke L., Bozzo C.P., Read C., Fois G., Eiseler T., Gehrmann J., van Vuuren J., Wessbecher I.M., Frick M., Costa I.G., Breunig M., Grüner B., Peters L., Schuster M., Liebau S., Seufferlein T., Stenger S., Stenzinger A., MacDonald P.E., Kirchhoff F., Sparrer K.M.J., Walther P., Lickert H., Barth T.F.E., Wagner M., Münch J., Heller S., Kleger A. SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Nat. Metab., 2021, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149-165.
  10. Nehme M., Braillard O., Chappuis F., Courvoisier D.S., Guessous I. Prevalence of symptoms more than seven months after diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. Ann. Intern. Med., 2021, Vol. 174, no. 9, pp. 1252-1260.
  11. Pierce J.D., Shen Q., Cintron S.A., Hiebert J.B. Post-COVID-19 Syndrome. Nurs. Res., 2022, Vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 164-174.
  12. Podzolkov V.I., Bragina A.E., Tarzimanova A.I., Vasil’eva L.V., Batrakova E.P., Lobova N.V., Bykova E.E., Khachuroeva M.M. Post-COVID Syndrome and Tachycardia: Theoretical Base and Treatment Experience. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology, 2021, Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 256-262. (In Russ.)
  13. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19): temporary guidelines. Ministry of Health of Russia. Moscow, 2023. 250 p. Version 18 (10/26/2023). Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_347896/.
  14. Radiation diagnostics of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): organization, methodology, interpretation of results: methodological recommendations No. 72. Preprint No. CDT –2020 –I. Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Department of Health. Moscow, 2020. 75 p. (Series: Best practices of radiation and instrumental diagnostics). doi: 10.17816/DD46791 Available at: http://omrao.ru/images/doc/covid_19/Luchevaya_diagnostika_Covid-19_Versia_2.pdf.
  15. Rubino F., Amiel S., Zimmet P., Alberti G., Bornstein S., Eckel R.H., Mingrone G., Boehm B., Cooper M.E., Chai Z., del Prato S., Ji L., Hopkins D., Herman W.H., Khunti K., Mbanya J.C., Renard E. New-onset diabetesin COVID-19. Engl. J. Med., 2020, Vol. 383, no. 8, pp. 789-790.
  16. Ruggeri R.M., Campenni A., Siracusa M., Frazzetto G., Gullo D. Subacute thyroiditis in a patient infected with SARS-COV-2: an endocrine complication linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Hormones, 2021, Vol. 20 no. 1, pp. 219-221.
  17. Siripanthong B., Nazarian S., Muser D., Deo R., Santangeli P., Khanji M.Y., Cooper L.T. Jr, Chahal C.A.A. Recognizing COVID-19-related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management. Heart Rhythm., 2020, Vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1463-1471.
  18. Suwanwongse K., Shabarek N. Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus, DKA, and COVID-19: Causality or coincidence? A report of three cases. J. Med. Virol., 2021, Vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 1150-1153.
  19. Tang X., Uhl S. Zhang T., Xue D., Li B., Vandana J.J., Acklin J.A., Bonnycastle L.L., Narisu N., Erdos M.R., Bram Y., Chandar V., Chong A.C.N., Lacko L.A., Min Z., Lim J.K., Borczuk A.C., Xiang J., Naji A., Collins F.S., Evans T., Liu C., tenOever B.R., Schwartz R.E., Chen S. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces beta cell transdifferentiation. Cell Metab., 2021, Vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1577-1591.e7.
  20. Wu Q., Zhou L., Sun X., Yan Z., Hu C., Wu J., Xu L., Li X., Liu H., Yin P., Li K., Zhao J., Li Y., Wang X., Li Y., Zhang Q., Xu G., Chen H. Altered lipid metabolism in recovered SARS patients twelve years after infection. Sci. Rep., 2017, Vol. 7, no. 1, 9110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09536-z.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Dobrynina M.A., Zurochka V.A., Zurochka A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 11525 от 04.01.2002.