EXPERIMENTAL MICE SEPSIS MODELS: ADVANTAGES AND PITFALLS

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Sepsis is studied in vivo by using experimental mice models. The golden standard is the model which utilizes peritonitis induction by cecal ligation and puncture. Lipopolysacharide injection is often used for induction of septic process as well. Currently, the researches discuss disadvantages of these models and poor modeling capability of mice sepsis compared to septic processes which take place in humans. The throughout discussion is present in the article by Cavaillon J. M. “New Approaches to Treat Sepsis: Animal Models Do Not Work” [1]. In this review the author questioned the sepsis animal models used nowadays, but he didn’t mentioned the experimental model described by Gonnert F. A. et al. in their work «Characteristics of Clinical Sepsis Refl ected in a Reliable and Reproducible Rodent Sepsis Model». Our review briefl y discusses the advantages of this model compared to the other animal sepsis models.

About the authors

O. V. Starkina

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhniy Novgorod

Author for correspondence.
Email: fake@neicon.ru

junior scientist, Neurotechnologies Department,

Nizhniy Novgorod

Russian Federation

N. A. Ilyukina

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhniy Novgorod

Email: fake@neicon.ru

student,

Nizhniy Novgorod

Russian Federation

T. L. Vassilev

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhniy Novgorod

Email: tchavdarv@gmail.com

senior scientist, Neurotechnologies Department,

Nizhniy Novgorod

Russian Federation

References

  1. Jean-Marc Cavaillon. New Approaches to Treat Sepsis: Animal Models «Do Not Work» (Review), General Reanimatology, 2018, 14; 3.
  2. Jean-Louis Vincent. Increasing awareness of sepsis: World Sepsis Day, Critical Care. 2012, 16:152.
  3. Gingles N. A., Alexander J. E., Kadioglu A., Andrew P. W., Kerr A., Mitchell T. J., Hopes E., Denny P., Brown S., Jones H. B., Little S., Booth G. C., McPheat W. L. Role of genetic resistance in invasive pneumococcal infection: identification and study of susceptibility and resistance in inbred mouse strains. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69 (1): 426–34.
  4. Angele M. K., Pratschke S., Hubbard W. J., Chaudry I. H. Gender differences in sepsis: cardiovascular and immunological aspects. Virulence. 2014,1; 5(1):12–9.
  5. Falk A. Gonnert M. D., Peter Recknagel, Madlen Seidel, Nayla Jbeily, M. S., Katja Dahlke, Clemens L. Bockmeyer, M.D., Johannes Winning, M.D, Wolfgang Losche, M.D., Ralf A. Claus and Michael Bauer, M.D. Characteristics of Clinical Sepsis Reflected in a Reliable and Reproducible Rodent Sepsis Model, Journal of Surgical Research. 2011, 170, 123.
  6. Dyson A., Singer M. Animal models of sepsis: Why does preclinical efficacy fail to translate to the clinical setting? Crit Care Med. 2009,;37(1 Suppl):30–7.
  7. Dan M., Richardson J., Miliotis M. D., Koornhof H. J. Comparison of preservation media and freezing conditions for storage of specimens of feces, J Med Microbiol. 1989, 28(2):151–4.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Starkina O.V., Ilyukina N.A., Vassilev T.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 11525 от 04.01.2002.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies